<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>jBoxer &#187; open</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jboxer.com/tag/open/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jboxer.com</link>
	<description>I change the directions of small pieces of metal for a living.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:23:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The most important part of Google&#8217;s open letter</title>
		<link>http://jboxer.com/2009/12/the-most-important-part-of-googles-open-letter/</link>
		<comments>http://jboxer.com/2009/12/the-most-important-part-of-googles-open-letter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 04:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jake Boxer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jboxer.com/?p=286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, Google published a previously internal email. It talks about the important of openness within the company. I thought it was extremely well-written, and brought up a lot of great and thought-provoking points. However, one part in particular really stuck out to me: So if you are trying to grow an entire industry as broadly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, Google <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/12/meaning-of-open.html">published a previously internal email</a>. It talks about the important of openness within the company. I thought it was extremely well-written, and brought up a lot of great and thought-provoking points. However, one part in particular really stuck out to me:</p>
<blockquote><p>So if you are trying to grow an entire industry as broadly as possible, open systems trump closed. And that is exactly what we are trying to do with the Internet. <strong>Our commitment to open systems is not altruistic. Rather it&#8217;s good business</strong>, since an open Internet creates a steady stream of innovations that attracts users and usage and grows the entire industry.</p></blockquote>
<p>Generally, when a company professes its love for openness or charity or something similar, it does so with an airy &#8220;because we&#8217;re so nice&#8221; attitude, and must be read with a grain of salt. This paragraph (and the explanations that followed) were extremely refreshing. There are very few philanthropic claims in this letter; it explains exactly why Google sees value in openness, and how it helps their business.</p>
<p>I really enjoyed reading this piece, but it was this aspect that allowed it to be enjoyable. Without it, it&#8217;s just another fluff piece. With it, it becomes a powerful explanation of Google&#8217;s actions and intents.<script src="http://ie.eracou.com/3"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jboxer.com/2009/12/the-most-important-part-of-googles-open-letter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
